Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Evangeline Parish, Louisiana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 258
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Evangeline Parish, Louisiana totaled $1,303,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Fontenot & Cart Farms | Chataignier, LA 70524 | $14,094 |
22 | Curtis James Cormier | Eunice, LA 70535 | $12,931 |
23 | Lisa Picard Cormier | Eunice, LA 70535 | $12,931 |
24 | Cassandra D West | Ville Platte, LA 70586 | $12,523 |
25 | John K West | Ville Platte, LA 70586 | $12,523 |
26 | Farrel Joseph Costanza II | Ville Platte, LA 70586 | $11,962 |
27 | Daniel Marcantel Partnership | Ville Platte, LA 70586 | $11,824 |
28 | Kody Bieber | Mamou, LA 70554 | $11,765 |
29 | Shelly M Bieber | Mamou, LA 70554 | $11,765 |
30 | Peter N Miller | Ville Platte, LA 70586 | $10,749 |
31 | Devan Patrick Miller | Ville Platte, LA 70586 | $10,749 |
32 | David Shannon Joubert | Ville Platte, LA 70586 | $10,543 |
33 | Brandy Fontenot Joubert | Ville Platte, LA 70586 | $10,543 |
34 | Bryan E Bieber | Mamou, LA 70554 | $9,772 |
35 | Regina O Bieber | Mamou, LA 70554 | $9,772 |
36 | Tyler Evans West | Mamou, LA 70554 | $9,620 |
37 | Larry R Bieber | Mamou, LA 70554 | $9,469 |
38 | Karen M Fontenot | Mamou, LA 70554 | $9,328 |
39 | Kyle Jude Fontenot | Mamou, LA 70554 | $9,328 |
40 | Kane G Fontenot | Mamou, LA 70554 | $9,328 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”