Counter Cyclical Program in West Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 68
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in West Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana totaled $563,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Westbank Planting Company, LLC | Port Allen, LA 70767 | $150,216 |
2 | Donald L Zaunbrecher | Bueche, LA 70729 | $147,235 |
3 | Glaser Farms Partnership | Oscar, LA 70762 | $41,060 |
4 | Milliken & Farwell Inc | New Orleans, LA 70112 | $33,980 |
5 | Ourso Farms Inc | White Castle, LA 70788 | $24,704 |
6 | Mark A Canezaro | Port Allen, LA 70767 | $16,846 |
7 | Carroll Hurdle & Son LLC | Rosedale, LA 70772 | $15,696 |
8 | Medine Farms Inc | White Castle, LA 70788 | $14,948 |
9 | Olivia Plantation Inc | Plaquemine, LA 70764 | $12,497 |
10 | J S Marks Farms Inc | Lakeland, LA 70752 | $11,445 |
11 | Schexnayder Planting & Manufactur | Erwinville, LA 70729 | $9,336 |
12 | C & J Hurdle Farms LLC | Rosedale, LA 70772 | $7,589 |
13 | Calumet Acres Lc | Saint Gabriel, LA 70776 | $7,552 |
14 | Robert Morris | Port Allen, LA 70767 | $7,373 |
15 | Bercham Holding Co Inc | Baton Rouge, LA 70821 | $5,155 |
16 | Canella Farms Inc | Addis, LA 70710 | $5,039 |
17 | David Hurlin Dupre | Port Barre, LA 70577 | $4,581 |
18 | Rodney J Courville | Maringouin, LA 70757 | $4,514 |
19 | C & L Farms | Lakeland, LA 70752 | $4,083 |
20 | Michael A Fortie | Maringouin, LA 70757 | $3,829 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>