Total Commodity Programs in Baltimore County, Maryland, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 443
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Baltimore County, Maryland totaled $33,547,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Clear Meadow Farm Ptr | White Hall, MD 21161 | $3,774,236 |
2 | Troyer Farms Jv | Jarrettsville, MD 21084 | $2,200,242 |
3 | Cold Bottom Farms Inc | Sparks, MD 21152 | $1,990,519 |
4 | Trenton Mill Farms Inc | Upperco, MD 21155 | $1,498,220 |
5 | Whitelyn Farms Inc | Hydes, MD 21082 | $1,231,885 |
6 | Clearmeadow Delete | White Hall, MD 21161 | $817,567 |
7 | Chilcoat Farms Enterprises | Stewartstown, PA 17363 | $714,166 |
8 | Jay C Mcginnis | White Hall, MD 21161 | $617,250 |
9 | Branchwater Farms Inc | Reisterstown, MD 21136 | $609,298 |
10 | Walter G Mays III | Upperco, MD 21155 | $603,431 |
11 | H Lee Morfoot | Upperco, MD 21155 | $540,796 |
12 | Cold Bottom Farms Inc | Sparks, MD 21152 | $526,510 |
13 | Spring Garden Farm Inc | Sparks, MD 21152 | $480,123 |
14 | Robert E Nash Jr | Glen Rock, PA 17327 | $473,224 |
15 | Minor Edward Bowman | Freeland, MD 21053 | $456,368 |
16 | K M Dietz Farms Inc | Glen Arm, MD 21057 | $436,587 |
17 | Empty Pockets Jv | Glen Arm, MD 21057 | $435,709 |
18 | Carroll E Price | Upperco, MD 21155 | $411,971 |
19 | Sparkle Dew Farms Inc | Upperco, MD 21155 | $407,249 |
20 | Donald E Cole | Hampstead, MD 21074 | $400,363 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>