Market Loss Assistance Program in Dorchester County, Maryland, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 386
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Dorchester County, Maryland totaled $3,593,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Clearview Farms Inc | Hurlock, MD 21643 | $43,498 |
22 | William F Outten Jr | Vienna, MD 21869 | $42,384 |
23 | Holly Lane Farms Inc | Church Creek, MD 21622 | $40,125 |
24 | Pine Haven Farms | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $40,108 |
25 | A N Harper & Son | East New Market, MD 21631 | $39,880 |
26 | Malkus Farms | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $38,612 |
27 | Gregory Burton | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $37,999 |
28 | William Beckwith Jr | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $37,392 |
29 | Ralph W Jackson Jr | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $36,285 |
30 | James A Kral | East New Market, MD 21631 | $35,228 |
31 | Richard R Wilson | East New Market, MD 21631 | $34,173 |
32 | Vernon G Boog | Riverview, FL 33569 | $33,664 |
33 | Michael Shufelt | Hurlock, MD 21643 | $33,617 |
34 | Jeff Edgar | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $31,852 |
35 | Alton Hoffman III | Rhodesdale, MD 21659 | $31,367 |
36 | Charles Beckwith | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $28,234 |
37 | E B Fleming Jr Estate | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $26,798 |
38 | Earlview Farms Inc | Hurlock, MD 21643 | $26,767 |
39 | Oliver W Hubbard | East New Market, MD 21631 | $26,067 |
40 | George W Weber & Sons Inc | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $22,771 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”