Total Commodity Programs in Dorchester County, Maryland, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 223
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Dorchester County, Maryland totaled $1,822,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Ralph W Jackson Iv | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $27,929 |
22 | John R Windsor | East New Market, MD 21631 | $27,912 |
23 | Chris Nagel | Vienna, MD 21869 | $27,285 |
24 | Grove Growers LLC | Vienna, MD 21869 | $27,052 |
25 | Breckenridge Farms LLC | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $26,965 |
26 | Poplar Hill Farms LLC | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $26,668 |
27 | Elizabeth Handley Nagel-elizabeth H. Nagel Living | Vienna, MD 21869 | $26,390 |
28 | Garrett Daniel Luthy | Cambridge, MD 21613 | $25,965 |
29 | Holly Lane Farms Inc | Church Creek, MD 21622 | $25,753 |
30 | George Windsor | East New Market, MD 21631 | $25,736 |
31 | Labrador Farms LLC | Vienna, MD 21869 | $24,873 |
32 | Barnett Farms, LLC | Rhodesdale, MD 21659 | $23,837 |
33 | Mac Farms Inc | Rhodesdale, MD 21659 | $22,010 |
34 | Walnut Hill Farms Inc | Hurlock, MD 21643 | $21,110 |
35 | Reginald Sellers Jr | Vienna, MD 21869 | $20,111 |
36 | Wootten Farms LLC | Seaford, DE 19973 | $20,089 |
37 | Reid Farms Inc | Rhodesdale, MD 21659 | $18,124 |
38 | William F Outten III | Vienna, MD 21869 | $16,957 |
39 | Michelle A Goehringer | Easton, MD 21601 | $16,418 |
40 | Wes Messick | East New Market, MD 21631 | $16,065 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”