Total Disaster Programs in Harford County, Maryland, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 195
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Harford County, Maryland totaled $1,316,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | J Bradley Milton | Bel Air, MD 21015 | $14,461 |
22 | F O Mitchell Bro Inc | Perryman, MD 21130 | $13,385 |
23 | Martin Brothers Ptr | Pylesville, MD 21132 | $13,349 |
24 | Kirk's Farm | Forest Hill, MD 21050 | $13,136 |
25 | Stephen C Trout | Forest Hill, MD 21050 | $12,779 |
26 | Indian Spring Farm | Darlington, MD 21034 | $12,025 |
27 | Geraldine Miller Estate | Darlington, MD 21034 | $11,432 |
28 | Fay E Barrow | Bel Air, MD 21015 | $11,313 |
29 | Carl William Nash Jr | Street, MD 21154 | $10,703 |
30 | Twin Pine Farms No | Whiteford, MD 21160 | $10,524 |
31 | James B Reeves Sr | Street, MD 21154 | $9,466 |
32 | Clear Meadow Farm Ptr | White Hall, MD 21161 | $9,068 |
33 | John S Ball | Churchville, MD 21028 | $8,945 |
34 | Srp Enterprises | White Hall, MD 21161 | $8,883 |
35 | Highland Heights Farm Inc | Street, MD 21154 | $8,784 |
36 | W Herbert Harkins | Forest Hill, MD 21050 | $8,537 |
37 | W Steven Archer | Darlington, MD 21034 | $8,453 |
38 | Hawks Hill Farm Inc | Forest Hill, MD 21050 | $8,385 |
39 | Twin Pine Farm Inc | Whiteford, MD 21160 | $8,064 |
40 | Mack C Moxley Jr | Bel Air, MD 21015 | $7,932 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”