Counter Cyclical Program in Talbot County, Maryland, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 322
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Talbot County, Maryland totaled $2,387,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hutchison Bros | Cordova, MD 21625 | $81,357 |
2 | Meadow Farm Joint Venture LLC | Easton, MD 21601 | $76,322 |
3 | Gustav Schlag | Wittman, MD 21676 | $74,335 |
4 | Roy G Brooks Sr | Easton, MD 21601 | $70,413 |
5 | Cecil Gannon & Sons Inc | Easton, MD 21601 | $62,598 |
6 | Philip A Foster & Sons | Trappe, MD 21673 | $61,276 |
7 | Kennedy Farms | Trappe, MD 21673 | $56,628 |
8 | John Swaine III | Royal Oak, MD 21662 | $55,901 |
9 | Edward Rhodes | Queen Anne, MD 21657 | $53,625 |
10 | Elsie Mae Rhodes | Queen Anne, MD 21657 | $53,625 |
11 | Garrett Bros LLC | Easton, MD 21601 | $51,765 |
12 | John O Brooks Jr | Easton, MD 21601 | $47,475 |
13 | Garland T Swann & Sons LLC | Easton, MD 21601 | $46,858 |
14 | Larry A Ewing | Easton, MD 21601 | $43,154 |
15 | David L Denny | Queen Anne, MD 21657 | $42,394 |
16 | Hans Asmussen & Sons Inc | Trappe, MD 21673 | $42,199 |
17 | Keith R Leaverton | Trappe, MD 21673 | $35,684 |
18 | Anders Farm | Easton, MD 21601 | $35,534 |
19 | Dan K Dulin | Queen Anne, MD 21657 | $34,846 |
20 | Christopher Metz | Preston, MD 21655 | $34,019 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>