Total Conservation Programs in Talbot County, Maryland, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 554
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Talbot County, Maryland totaled $23,759,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Cyclops Family Partnership Lp | Oxford, MD 21654 | $750,399 |
2 | Hollywood Farm LLC | Oxford, MD 21654 | $671,606 |
3 | Irvin Knauer Jr | Trappe, MD 21673 | $631,863 |
4 | Mt Pleasant Farm Inc | Easton, MD 21601 | $621,369 |
5 | Duvall Farm LLC | Oxford, MD 21654 | $616,442 |
6 | Chesapeake Audubon Society Inc | Easton, MD 21601 | $606,702 |
7 | Julian Nave | Trappe, MD 21673 | $503,242 |
8 | W Harold Lyons | Easton, MD 21601 | $360,500 |
9 | Residuary Trust U/w Of John L Firth | Easton, MD 21601 | $329,306 |
10 | Roy G Brooks Sr | Easton, MD 21601 | $323,484 |
11 | Sans Souci Farm Association Inc | Mcdaniel, MD 21647 | $315,853 |
12 | James L Crothers | Easton, MD 21601 | $313,976 |
13 | Jean Blades | Trappe, MD 21673 | $295,749 |
14 | Delahay Family Lmtd Partnership | Oxford, MD 21654 | $289,300 |
15 | Sylvester Farms Inc | Queen Anne, MD 21657 | $274,767 |
16 | Thomas R Hughes Jr | Easton, MD 21601 | $258,694 |
17 | Trippes Creek LLC | Easton, MD 21601 | $247,483 |
18 | Holton Rhodes Jr | Wye Mills, MD 21679 | $236,217 |
19 | Kirby Wharf Investments LLC | Trappe, MD 21673 | $218,053 |
20 | John K Waters | Oxford, MD 21654 | $217,119 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>