Farm Subsidy information
Worcester County, Maryland
Total Subsidies in Worcester County, Maryland, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 882
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Worcester County, Maryland totaled $111,290,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | David F Shockley | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $828,859 |
22 | Tull Farms Inc | Whaleyville, MD 21872 | $708,234 |
23 | K&c Farms Inc | Berlin, MD 21811 | $687,074 |
24 | Holland Land Company | New Church, VA 23415 | $684,113 |
25 | Byron Hauck | Girdletree, MD 21829 | $628,709 |
26 | Thomas J Johnson III | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $623,414 |
27 | A W Owen Jr | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $619,355 |
28 | Harley Wayne Tull | Whaleyville, MD 21872 | $602,905 |
29 | George Lee Clayville | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $596,261 |
30 | Mark Drew | Bishopville, MD 21813 | $595,793 |
31 | Brooks Aydelotte | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $581,942 |
32 | William E Davis Sr | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $573,696 |
33 | Michael Beauchamp | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $566,038 |
34 | Alfred Lewis Bilbrough Sr | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $561,794 |
35 | Randy Hastings | Berlin, MD 21811 | $555,827 |
36 | Richard Evans | Berlin, MD 21811 | $542,669 |
37 | Poplar Ridge Farms Inc | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $539,220 |
38 | Robinson Bros | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $526,435 |
39 | Emily Jean Taylor | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $522,042 |
40 | John H Shockley | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $514,495 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”