Loan Deficiency in Worcester County, Maryland, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 292
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Worcester County, Maryland totaled $12,983,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Ag Renewal Enterprises Inc | Berlin, MD 21811 | $161,075 |
22 | Bayside Farms Ltd Partnership | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $159,145 |
23 | Richard E Jones | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $155,142 |
24 | Holloway Brothers | Berlin, MD 21811 | $148,951 |
25 | H Watson Powell Sr | Newark, MD 21841 | $137,655 |
26 | Pearson Farms Inc | Berlin, MD 21811 | $134,848 |
27 | Michael Beauchamp | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $133,957 |
28 | Queponco Farms Inc | Newark, MD 21841 | $133,363 |
29 | Kenneth Littleton Sr | Berlin, MD 21811 | $131,830 |
30 | Alfred Lewis Bilbrough Sr | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $126,146 |
31 | George B Bounds | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $118,483 |
32 | Bruning Farms LLC | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $116,915 |
33 | Gerald B Brown | Stockton, MD 21864 | $115,145 |
34 | Edwin Dale Hastings | Berlin, MD 21811 | $113,149 |
35 | Percy S Maddux | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $110,084 |
36 | Hastings Family Partnership | Berlin, MD 21811 | $104,819 |
37 | W Dan Redden & Son | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $104,027 |
38 | Mark Drew | Bishopville, MD 21813 | $97,033 |
39 | Walter B Widgeon | Berlin, MD 21811 | $91,232 |
40 | William M Gray | Bishopville, MD 21813 | $88,897 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”