Total Commodity Programs in Worcester County, Maryland, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 511
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Worcester County, Maryland totaled $57,036,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Brooks Aydelotte | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $396,716 |
42 | Douglas A Jones | Berlin, MD 21811 | $394,849 |
43 | B & R Farms LLC | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $383,795 |
44 | George B Bounds | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $376,280 |
45 | Gerald B Brown | Stockton, MD 21864 | $368,182 |
46 | Louis T Bradford | Newark, MD 21841 | $363,715 |
47 | Benson Farms Inc | Bishopville, MD 21813 | $350,386 |
48 | Bayside Farms Ltd Partnership | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $348,583 |
49 | Edwin Dale Hastings | Berlin, MD 21811 | $340,818 |
50 | Redden Farms | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $331,836 |
51 | Hastings Family Partnership | Berlin, MD 21811 | $324,728 |
52 | Dale Holland | Greenbackville, VA 23356 | $308,582 |
53 | Pearson Farms Inc | Berlin, MD 21811 | $291,556 |
54 | Clayville Farm | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $270,932 |
55 | Robert Wilmer Riley Jr | Newark, MD 21841 | $264,436 |
56 | Robert Figgs | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $241,568 |
57 | William T Figgs | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $240,870 |
58 | James Kurtz | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $240,849 |
59 | Benjamin T Aydelotte | Stockton, MD 21864 | $236,587 |
60 | Dale Hastings Farms LLC | Berlin, MD 21811 | $232,913 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”