Direct Payment Program in Worcester County, Maryland, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 303
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Worcester County, Maryland totaled $12,466,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Smith Farms Partnership | Bishopville, MD 21813 | $1,183,076 |
2 | Lambertson Farms Inc | Stockton, MD 21864 | $442,318 |
3 | Roger L Richardson | Eden, MD 21822 | $436,208 |
4 | Twin Oak Farms Inc | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $398,268 |
5 | Newark Grain Inc | Berlin, MD 21811 | $387,889 |
6 | Murray Brothers LLC | Selbyville, DE 19975 | $373,463 |
7 | Ag Renewal Enterprises Inc | Berlin, MD 21811 | $327,575 |
8 | Carol L Littleton | Berlin, MD 21811 | $311,693 |
9 | Everett D Holland & Sons Inc | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $306,711 |
10 | Aydelotte Farms Inc | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $286,333 |
11 | George H Dryden Jr | Newark, MD 21841 | $264,178 |
12 | Alfred Lewis Bilbrough Sr | Snow Hill, MD 21863 | $250,129 |
13 | Richard E Jones | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $243,947 |
14 | Queponco Farms Inc | Newark, MD 21841 | $243,323 |
15 | Harley Wayne Tull | Whaleyville, MD 21872 | $240,969 |
16 | F A Holland & Sons | New Church, VA 23415 | $232,792 |
17 | Holloway Brothers | Berlin, MD 21811 | $219,289 |
18 | Glad Mar Grain Inc | Pocomoke City, MD 21851 | $198,311 |
19 | Randy Hastings | Berlin, MD 21811 | $191,388 |
20 | Byron Hauck | Girdletree, MD 21829 | $184,959 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>