Farm Subsidy information
Bay County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Bay County, Michigan, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 307
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Bay County, Michigan totaled $7,100,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Thomas Vanochten | Essexville, MI 48732 | $126,856 |
2 | Hampton Potato Growers LLC | Essexville, MI 48732 | $125,000 |
3 | Deshano Farms Inc | Auburn, MI 48611 | $109,715 |
4 | Helmreich Farms Inc | Freeland, MI 48623 | $94,073 |
5 | Kevin Wackerle | Linwood, MI 48634 | $90,632 |
6 | , | $77,297 | |
7 | Michael J Krzyzaniak | Pinconning, MI 48650 | $69,625 |
8 | Schlatter Farms LLC | Linwood, MI 48634 | $64,954 |
9 | Schindler Farms LLC | Kawkawlin, MI 48631 | $54,441 |
10 | K & L Schultz Farms | Bay City, MI 48708 | $47,776 |
11 | Harry Gaiser Jr | Bay City, MI 48706 | $47,502 |
12 | Stockmeyer Family Farms | Reese, MI 48757 | $42,390 |
13 | C & K Ratajczak Family Farms, LLC | Munger, MI 48747 | $41,801 |
14 | Scott Loesel | Auburn, MI 48611 | $41,490 |
15 | Jason Gaiser | Bay City, MI 48706 | $38,393 |
16 | Hribek Farms, LLC | Linwood, MI 48634 | $37,621 |
17 | M & D Huber Farms | Auburn, MI 48611 | $37,146 |
18 | Ronald Gerald Rokosz | Pinconning, MI 48650 | $36,874 |
19 | J Wm Schmidt Jr | Kawkawlin, MI 48631 | $35,213 |
20 | Bryan Schwab | Kawkawlin, MI 48631 | $33,383 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>