Farm Subsidy information
Calhoun County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Calhoun County, Michigan, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 492
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Calhoun County, Michigan totaled $10,366,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Holloo Farms LLC | Marshall, MI 49068 | $240,166 |
2 | Wildt Farms | Homer, MI 49245 | $186,101 |
3 | Crandall Dairy Farms LLC | Battle Creek, MI 49017 | $138,525 |
4 | Jeffrey A Willson | Marshall, MI 49068 | $134,689 |
5 | Bernardus H Amting | Marshall, MI 49068 | $133,025 |
6 | Blight Farms Inc | Albion, MI 49224 | $125,261 |
7 | Cary Dairy Farm Inc | Battle Creek, MI 49017 | $114,910 |
8 | Kiessling Family Farms Inc | Marshall, MI 49068 | $93,754 |
9 | Hiscock Farms Inc | Climax, MI 49034 | $90,042 |
10 | David R Bosserd | Marshall, MI 49068 | $86,589 |
11 | Brian A Dietz | Tekonsha, MI 49092 | $86,205 |
12 | Double Eagle Farms II | Marshall, MI 49068 | $62,785 |
13 | Brent Vandenheede | Marshall, MI 49068 | $61,997 |
14 | Washburn Acres LLC | Union City, MI 49094 | $58,066 |
15 | Daniel L Williams | Homer, MI 49245 | $57,895 |
16 | Shrontz Farms | Olivet, MI 49076 | $57,143 |
17 | Dennis M Fuller | East Leroy, MI 49051 | $57,119 |
18 | Sackrider Farms LLC | Battle Creek, MI 49014 | $54,110 |
19 | Douglas G Myers | Marshall, MI 49068 | $53,749 |
20 | Angela K Myers | Marshall, MI 49068 | $53,747 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>