Farm Subsidy information
Clinton County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Clinton County, Michigan, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 184
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Clinton County, Michigan totaled $8,676,000 in in 2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dutch Meadows Dairy LLC | Fowler, MI 48835 | $213,117 |
| 2 | Green Meadow Farms Enterprises LLC | Elsie, MI 48831 | $178,283 |
| 3 | Kurncz Farms Inc | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $157,692 |
| 4 | T & H Dairy II | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $147,045 |
| 5 | Nobis Dairy Farms | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $145,187 |
| 6 | Thelen Dairy Inc | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $129,773 |
| 7 | K & K Dairy Farms, LLC | Westphalia, MI 48894 | $127,946 |
| 8 | Oak View Dairy LLC | Westphalia, MI 48894 | $127,698 |
| 9 | Sanborn & Sons LLC | Hubbardston, MI 48845 | $127,264 |
| 10 | Maple Glaze Dairy LLC | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $126,320 |
| 11 | Evergreen Dairy Farm, LLC | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $124,414 |
| 12 | Nash Dairy Farm LLC | Elsie, MI 48831 | $122,390 |
| 13 | Stony Creek Dairy LLC | Westphalia, MI 48894 | $122,029 |
| 14 | Leroy E Schafer | Westphalia, MI 48894 | $122,023 |
| 15 | Brett M Stump | Fowler, MI 48835 | $120,642 |
| 16 | D & M Schrader Dairy LLC | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $116,505 |
| 17 | Jon M Thelen | Westphalia, MI 48894 | $104,473 |
| 18 | , | $101,271 | |
| 19 | Baese Family Farm LLC | Elsie, MI 48831 | $99,521 |
| 20 | Rich-ro Dairy LLC | Saint Johns, MI 48879 | $83,506 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
