Counter Cyclical Program in Huron County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,239
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Huron County, Michigan totaled $8,717,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | John C Richmond & Sons Dairy Farms LLC | Bay Port, MI 48720 | $38,489 |
42 | Jon-bird Farms Inc | Kinde, MI 48445 | $38,134 |
43 | Denson Smith | Caseville, MI 48725 | $37,995 |
44 | Kirkpatrick Farms | Kinde, MI 48445 | $35,988 |
45 | Thuemmel Dairy Inc | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $35,408 |
46 | Albert F Hass | Bad Axe, MI 48413 | $35,398 |
47 | Cedar Pond Farms Inc | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $34,219 |
48 | Christopher Martin Guza | Ubly, MI 48475 | $33,764 |
49 | Szymanski Farms Inc | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $33,004 |
50 | Tait Farms Inc | Caseville, MI 48725 | $32,654 |
51 | Gruehn Farms Inc | Sebewaing, MI 48759 | $31,441 |
52 | Crescent Valley Farms Inc | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $31,143 |
53 | Jack Sturm Inc | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $30,859 |
54 | James Osentoski | Ubly, MI 48475 | $30,726 |
55 | Eric Joseph Hagen | Ubly, MI 48475 | $30,683 |
56 | Larry William Roggenbuck | Harbor Beach, MI 48441 | $30,664 |
57 | Big-b Farms Inc | Port Austin, MI 48467 | $30,409 |
58 | Kb Inc | Pigeon, MI 48755 | $30,352 |
59 | Yoder Farms Inc | Bay Port, MI 48720 | $30,049 |
60 | Tom Haag Inc | Sebewaing, MI 48759 | $29,884 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”