Farm Subsidy information
Ontonagon County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Ontonagon County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 114
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Ontonagon County, Michigan totaled $3,245,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Clinton J Weber | Ewen, MI 49925 | $1,371 |
82 | Russell Game | Trout Creek, MI 49967 | $1,125 |
83 | Drm Farms LLC Attn John Thomas | Cumberland, WI 54829 | $942 |
84 | Richard Dehaan | Mass City, MI 49948 | $923 |
85 | Harold E Lampi | Royal Oak, MI 48067 | $894 |
86 | B Dawayne Holtz | Bruce Crossing, MI 49912 | $852 |
87 | Debbie P Dix | Ontonagon, MI 49953 | $772 |
88 | Mud Creek Valley Farms | Mass City, MI 49948 | $730 |
89 | Talula Farm LLC | Ontonagon, MI 49953 | $698 |
90 | Melvin Sulkanen | Mass City, MI 49948 | $657 |
91 | Guy J W Kitzman | Ewen, MI 49925 | $629 |
92 | Steven E Anderson | Chassell, MI 49916 | $606 |
93 | Merrill Preiss | Rockland, MI 49960 | $525 |
94 | Albert Kurtti | Bruce Crossing, MI 49912 | $508 |
95 | John Talsma - John Talsma Trust | Bruce Crossing, MI 49912 | $437 |
96 | John C Labyak | Ontonagon, MI 49953 | $405 |
97 | Frank Dombkowski | Mass City, MI 49948 | $384 |
98 | Harold Roberts | Bruce Crossing, MI 49912 | $351 |
99 | Andrew Syrjala | Watton, MI 49970 | $261 |
100 | Michael Welsh | Bruce Crossing, MI 49912 | $250 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”