Farm Subsidy information

Ontonagon County, Michigan

Total Subsidies in Ontonagon County, Michigan, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 114

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Ontonagon County, Michigan totaled $3,245,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2023
1Norman Pestka Construction IncOntonagon, MI 49953$735,167
2James H FanslauEwen, MI 49925$287,810
3Shimp's Dairy FarmBruce Crossing, MI 49912$178,574
4Terry L PerttulaBruce Crossing, MI 49912$176,917
5Robert Roy RoblEwen, MI 49925$175,842
6Thomas WorachekEwen, MI 49925$140,437
7Leo E SirenMass City, MI 49948$125,328
8A & M Perttu & SonsBruce Crossing, MI 49912$96,073
9Clifford H LindbergBruce Crossing, MI 49912$73,730
10Shimp RanchBruce Crossing, MI 49912$73,605
11Thomas L PerttuBruce Crossing, MI 49912$69,864
12Bryan BesonenTrout Creek, MI 49967$62,362
13Perttu FarmsBruce Crossing, MI 49912$55,086
14Mike Nordine Trucking LLCBergland, MI 49910$52,875
15Weisinger Forest Products Inc.Ontonagon, MI 49953$52,875
16Pollard Logging LLCOntonagon, MI 49953$52,875
17Hilborn's Custom Timber ManagementWhite Pine, MI 49971$52,875
18Frank WardynskiOntonagon, MI 49953$50,373
19George Truscott LoggingGreenland, MI 49929$48,811
20Clarence WilburGreenland, MI 49929$47,531

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag