Farm Subsidy information
Ontonagon County, Michigan
Total Subsidies in Ontonagon County, Michigan, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 31
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Ontonagon County, Michigan totaled $351,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mike Nordine Trucking LLC | Bergland, MI 49910 | $52,875 |
| 2 | Weisinger Forest Products Inc. | Ontonagon, MI 49953 | $52,875 |
| 3 | Pollard Logging LLC | Ontonagon, MI 49953 | $52,875 |
| 4 | Hilborn's Custom Timber Management | White Pine, MI 49971 | $52,875 |
| 5 | George Truscott Logging | Greenland, MI 49929 | $48,811 |
| 6 | Joe Kin Trucking Inc | Greenland, MI 49929 | $30,414 |
| 7 | Smith Forest Products LLC | Bruce Crossing, MI 49912 | $19,952 |
| 8 | Terry L Perttula | Bruce Crossing, MI 49912 | $18,182 |
| 9 | Mark Stadler | Bruce Crossing, MI 49912 | $4,914 |
| 10 | Shimp Ranch | Bruce Crossing, MI 49912 | $2,976 |
| 11 | Dehaan Forest Products | Mass City, MI 49948 | $2,734 |
| 12 | Frank Wardynski | Ontonagon, MI 49953 | $2,506 |
| 13 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $1,114 |
| 14 | Thomas L Perttu | Bruce Crossing, MI 49912 | $1,014 |
| 15 | Michael B Coffey | Mass City, MI 49948 | $866 |
| 16 | Leroy Sadlier | Mass City, MI 49948 | $824 |
| 17 | Debbie P Dix | Ontonagon, MI 49953 | $817 |
| 18 | Neill Wascher | Mass City, MI 49948 | $703 |
| 19 | Bryan Besonen | Trout Creek, MI 49967 | $699 |
| 20 | Talula Farm LLC | Ontonagon, MI 49953 | $698 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf