Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Sanilac County, Michigan, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 712
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Sanilac County, Michigan totaled $7,535,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Loren Wayne Iseler | Peck, MI 48466 | $60,028 |
22 | Wadsworth Farms Inc | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $59,268 |
23 | S Shaw Farms LLC | Decker, MI 48426 | $59,023 |
24 | Thomas Roberts Farms Inc | Palms, MI 48465 | $58,360 |
25 | Robb Falls | Carsonville, MI 48419 | $57,363 |
26 | Roger Cleland | Deckerville, MI 48427 | $55,372 |
27 | Jeffrey A Furness | Yale, MI 48097 | $54,120 |
28 | Michael J Blashill | Croswell, MI 48422 | $53,547 |
29 | Steenbergh Farms | Melvin, MI 48454 | $53,543 |
30 | Larson Farms LLC | Applegate, MI 48401 | $52,436 |
31 | Anna Mae Terpenning | Marlette, MI 48453 | $51,104 |
32 | John D Boegner Jr | Marlette, MI 48453 | $50,558 |
33 | West Farms Inc | Croswell, MI 48422 | $50,226 |
34 | Daniel Strickler | Peck, MI 48466 | $49,826 |
35 | Mc Of Mc Inc | Minden City, MI 48456 | $46,354 |
36 | Stolicker Farms Inc | Palms, MI 48465 | $41,841 |
37 | Kenneth Earl Landsburg | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $41,159 |
38 | R & P Gerstenberger Farms LLC | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $40,929 |
39 | Quandt Farms Inc | Peck, MI 48466 | $39,407 |
40 | Gerstenberger Farms Inc | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $37,964 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”