Total Commodity Programs in Sanilac County, Michigan, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 777
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Sanilac County, Michigan totaled $11,067,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Jeffrey A Furness | Yale, MI 48097 | $59,102 |
42 | Gerstenberger Farms Inc | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $58,539 |
43 | Loren Wayne Iseler | Peck, MI 48466 | $58,262 |
44 | Mcleod Farms LLC | Brown City, MI 48416 | $57,175 |
45 | R & G Hooper Farms, Inc. | Deckerville, MI 48427 | $57,144 |
46 | Dorothy Sanford | Deckerville, MI 48427 | $56,209 |
47 | Donald H Rickett III | Carsonville, MI 48419 | $53,170 |
48 | B.w. Hulett Farms Inc | Greenwood, MI 48006 | $51,442 |
49 | Gordon Brothers & Sons Inc | Croswell, MI 48422 | $50,928 |
50 | Quandt Farms Inc | Peck, MI 48466 | $50,821 |
51 | Kenneth Earl Landsburg | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $50,801 |
52 | Dave Walsh Farms LLC | Ubly, MI 48475 | $50,407 |
53 | Timothy Paul Demaray | Melvin, MI 48454 | $49,390 |
54 | Ruggles Farms LLC | Marlette, MI 48453 | $48,603 |
55 | Maple Grove Acres Inc | Ruth, MI 48470 | $47,865 |
56 | Stone Brothers | Sandusky, MI 48471 | $47,828 |
57 | Sawmill Creek Farms LLC | Richmond, MI 48062 | $47,694 |
58 | Hwr Farms LLC | Marlette, MI 48453 | $47,590 |
59 | Mc Acres LLC | Minden City, MI 48456 | $46,404 |
60 | Dale Stamp Farms | Marlette, MI 48453 | $46,318 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”