Counter Cyclical Program in Minnesota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 52,923
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Minnesota totaled $521,541,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hader Farms Partnership | Zumbrota, MN 55992 | $590,688 |
2 | Molitor Bros Farm | Cannon Falls, MN 55009 | $468,098 |
3 | Hector Farms II Partnership | Hector, MN 55342 | $466,019 |
4 | Sunset Farms Of Freeborn County | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $313,138 |
5 | Sanders Farms | Truman, MN 56088 | $308,748 |
6 | Far Gaze Farms | Northfield, MN 55057 | $254,283 |
7 | Vipond Farms | Norcross, MN 56274 | $234,940 |
8 | Ger-bes Enterprises | Hastings, MN 55033 | $230,270 |
9 | Two Dogs Farm | Benson, MN 56215 | $224,528 |
10 | Four K Farms Ptshp | Morris, MN 56267 | $223,013 |
11 | Bunne Farms | Ostrander, MN 55961 | $217,745 |
12 | Cjw Farms | Renville, MN 56284 | $201,422 |
13 | Meuleners Farms Grain Partnership | Young America, MN 55397 | $197,150 |
14 | Lilleberg Farms General Partnership | Atwater, MN 56209 | $193,612 |
15 | Gorans Farms | Blomkest, MN 56216 | $192,610 |
16 | White Horse Partners | Spicer, MN 56288 | $191,561 |
17 | Summit Farms-family | Dexter, MN 55926 | $189,432 |
18 | Giese Farms Ptshp | Hoffman, MN 56339 | $186,216 |
19 | Marthaler Farms | Osakis, MN 56360 | $185,184 |
20 | University Of Minnesota | Crookston, MN 56716 | $181,944 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>