Total Disaster Programs in Minnesota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 59,293
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Minnesota totaled $1,270,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Wakefield Pork Inc | Gaylord, MN 55334 | $3,632,244 |
2 | Molitor Bros Farm | Cannon Falls, MN 55009 | $2,686,954 |
3 | Pederson Brothers Partnership | Bejou, MN 56516 | $2,105,383 |
4 | Oberg Farms Prtshp | Moorhead, MN 56560 | $1,896,175 |
5 | Wilmer Farms Inc | Warroad, MN 56763 | $1,417,293 |
6 | Skaurud Grain Farms | Gary, MN 56545 | $1,277,663 |
7 | Stoltman Farms | Argyle, MN 56713 | $1,166,989 |
8 | Reece Farms Inc. | Farwell, MN 56327 | $1,141,158 |
9 | Reece Industries Inc. | Lowry, MN 56349 | $1,141,156 |
10 | Kbq Inc | Mountain Lake, MN 56159 | $1,134,267 |
11 | Hugoson Pork Inc | Granada, MN 56039 | $993,215 |
12 | Mattson Farms Partnership | Lake Park, MN 56554 | $920,781 |
13 | Sundberg Apiaries Inc | Erhard, MN 56534 | $905,671 |
14 | P & W Farms | Elbow Lake, MN 56531 | $867,310 |
15 | Sanders Farms | Truman, MN 56088 | $856,398 |
16 | Field Brothers Farms Gp | Stephen, MN 56757 | $829,191 |
17 | Magnusson Farms | Roseau, MN 56751 | $814,520 |
18 | Agcountry Farm Credit Services ** | Jamestown, ND 58402 | $804,829 |
19 | Hader Farms Partnership | Zumbrota, MN 55992 | $802,727 |
20 | Jirak Bros Farming Partnership | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $793,903 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>