Total Commodity Programs in Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 39,472
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Minnesota totaled $551,776,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Silverstreak Dairies LLC | Pierz, MN 56364 | $338,954 |
22 | Chs Capital LLC ** | Inver Grove Heights, MN 55077 | $327,480 |
23 | Baer Poultry Company Inc | Lake Park, MN 56554 | $326,701 |
24 | Union Dairy Llp | Watkins, MN 55389 | $322,902 |
25 | Raguse Family Partnership | Wheaton, MN 56296 | $320,280 |
26 | Hilltop Swine | Morris, MN 56267 | $311,612 |
27 | Deal Bros Farming Partnership | Doran, MN 56522 | $306,555 |
28 | Bell Bank ** | Fargo, ND 58103 | $305,052 |
29 | Molitor Bros Farm | Cannon Falls, MN 55009 | $302,434 |
30 | Stoltman Farms | Argyle, MN 56713 | $288,068 |
31 | Tony Dick Enterprises LLC | Mountain Lake, MN 56159 | $281,866 |
32 | 4 S Farms LLC | Wood Lake, MN 56297 | $278,095 |
33 | Newalta Dairy LLC | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $271,153 |
34 | Hector Farms III Family Partnership | Hector, MN 55342 | $270,718 |
35 | Thorson Farming Joint Venture | East Grand Forks, MN 56721 | $269,342 |
36 | Quarry Hill Dairy LLC | Rollingstone, MN 55969 | $267,573 |
37 | Valley Acres Dairy LLC | Lewiston, MN 55952 | $264,712 |
38 | Agrifund LLC ** | Amarillo, TX 79106 | $264,091 |
39 | Skaurud Grain Farms | Gary, MN 56545 | $262,216 |
40 | Jirak Bros Farming Partnership | Breckenridge, MN 56520 | $261,333 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”