Farm Subsidy information
Becker County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Becker County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 2,880
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Becker County, Minnesota totaled $336,537,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Bergen's Greenhouses Inc | Detroit Lakes, MN 56501 | $527,296 |
82 | Todd Mikulecky | Hawley, MN 56549 | $525,364 |
83 | Robert Dewandeler | Ponsford, MN 56575 | $525,008 |
84 | Nancy A Carter | Fergus Falls, MN 56537 | $524,669 |
85 | Alan Butler | Rochert, MN 56578 | $524,550 |
86 | Nelson Farms & Sons | Lake Park, MN 56554 | $524,035 |
87 | Todd M. Andresen | Detroit Lakes, MN 56501 | $520,988 |
88 | Gerald Jirava | Ogema, MN 56569 | $518,050 |
89 | Leslie Duane Hanson | Ponsford, MN 56575 | $515,077 |
90 | Thomas Bergren | Lake Park, MN 56554 | $505,909 |
91 | Doug Morrison | Waubun, MN 56589 | $505,770 |
92 | Richard Faus | Lake Park, MN 56554 | $504,357 |
93 | David W Schneidermann | Ulen, MN 56585 | $500,920 |
94 | Bryan Anderson | Lake Park, MN 56554 | $500,007 |
95 | Andrew W Keranen | Menahga, MN 56464 | $497,528 |
96 | Midwest Bank ** | Detroit Lakes, MN 56502 | $485,706 |
97 | Jeffrey Gillespie | Audubon, MN 56511 | $482,797 |
98 | Keith G Gulbranson And Denise L Gulbranson Revocab | Park Rapids, MN 56470 | $481,468 |
99 | Skye M Bjerke | Lake Park, MN 56554 | $478,037 |
100 | Timothy Aho | Frazee, MN 56544 | $476,823 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”