Farm Subsidy information
Brown County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Brown County, Minnesota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 890
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Brown County, Minnesota totaled $15,712,000 in in 2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | James L Mickelson | Springfield, MN 56087 | $270,709 |
| 2 | Rs Ranch Inc | Sanborn, MN 56083 | $259,256 |
| 3 | D & A Farms Inc | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $251,891 |
| 4 | Dain Kenneth Moldan | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $251,459 |
| 5 | Donald Thomas Hoffman | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $231,476 |
| 6 | Todd Ibberson | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $197,587 |
| 7 | Spring Creek Dairy Farms Inc | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $127,845 |
| 8 | Stadick Farm Inc | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $127,538 |
| 9 | Thomas J Portner | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $125,668 |
| 10 | Steven John Meyer | Springfield, MN 56087 | $123,571 |
| 11 | Jonathan S Seifert | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $122,782 |
| 12 | David D Tauer | Hanska, MN 56041 | $122,360 |
| 13 | Duane Suess | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $113,355 |
| 14 | Berkner Family Farms LLC | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $110,174 |
| 15 | Brian L Nelson | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $101,910 |
| 16 | Schumacher Dairy Inc | Comfrey, MN 56019 | $100,775 |
| 17 | Jonathan B Petermann | Sleepy Eye, MN 56085 | $99,881 |
| 18 | William Jon Vogel | Comfrey, MN 56019 | $98,450 |
| 19 | Skh Inc | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $93,071 |
| 20 | Michael Gerard Griebel | New Ulm, MN 56073 | $92,323 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
