Oilseed Program in Chisago County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 222
Recipients of Oilseed Program from farms in Chisago County, Minnesota totaled $347,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Oilseed Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Barry Engdahl | Rush City, MN 55069 | $4,293 |
22 | Gerald Koran | Taylors Falls, MN 55084 | $4,125 |
23 | Arthur C Engdahl | North Branch, MN 55056 | $4,090 |
24 | Kent Reed | Center City, MN 55012 | $4,029 |
25 | Flodquist Farms | North Branch, MN 55056 | $3,908 |
26 | Albert J Cebery Sr | Shafer, MN 55074 | $3,806 |
27 | Cameron Strand | Chisago City, MN 55013 | $3,735 |
28 | Orville E Anderson | Harris, MN 55032 | $3,650 |
29 | Verner Greene Jr | Shafer, MN 55074 | $3,390 |
30 | Charles Wilcox | Harris, MN 55032 | $3,386 |
31 | Martin W Johnson | Taylors Falls, MN 55084 | $3,056 |
32 | Glenn A Carlson | Lindstrom, MN 55045 | $2,931 |
33 | Donald J Steinke | Forest Lake, MN 55025 | $2,903 |
34 | Dale Thiry | Stanchfield, MN 55080 | $2,885 |
35 | David C Johnson | Lindstrom, MN 55045 | $2,875 |
36 | Bradley D Johnson | Shafer, MN 55074 | $2,746 |
37 | Thomas J Smuder | Rush City, MN 55069 | $2,666 |
38 | Mold Farm Partnership | Rush City, MN 55069 | $2,639 |
39 | Nick Buehring | Rush City, MN 55069 | $2,638 |
40 | Neal Dueholm | Chisago City, MN 55013 | $2,567 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”