Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Chisago County, Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 207
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Chisago County, Minnesota totaled $1,539,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Chad Buehring | Rush City, MN 55069 | $17,076 |
22 | Marvin Schroeder | Stillwater, MN 55082 | $16,667 |
23 | Taylor Farms LLC | Forest Lake, MN 55025 | $15,932 |
24 | Brian D Greene | Shafer, MN 55074 | $15,239 |
25 | Petersen Farms Of Rush City Inc | Rush City, MN 55069 | $15,199 |
26 | Lofgren Farms LLC | Harris, MN 55032 | $15,187 |
27 | Richard Prahl | Chisago City, MN 55013 | $13,213 |
28 | Kent Reed | Center City, MN 55012 | $12,939 |
29 | Mark Moulton | Rush City, MN 55069 | $12,708 |
30 | Swenson Farms LLC | North Branch, MN 55056 | $12,607 |
31 | Travis Hjerpe | Rush City, MN 55069 | $12,488 |
32 | Cindy Blatz | Rush City, MN 55069 | $12,458 |
33 | Robb Medin | Center City, MN 55012 | $12,337 |
34 | Keith K Johnson | Center City, MN 55012 | $12,039 |
35 | Steven Houle | Forest Lake, MN 55025 | $11,896 |
36 | Eric Eklund | Ham Lake, MN 55304 | $11,625 |
37 | Bradley Gene Hunter | North Branch, MN 55056 | $10,928 |
38 | Donald J Steinke | Forest Lake, MN 55025 | $10,411 |
39 | Waletzko Brothers LLC | North Branch, MN 55056 | $10,304 |
40 | Stacy Burnside | North Branch, MN 55056 | $9,731 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”