Total Commodity Programs in Chisago County, Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 231
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Chisago County, Minnesota totaled $2,005,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Cindy Blatz | Rush City, MN 55069 | $12,458 |
42 | Robb Medin | Center City, MN 55012 | $12,337 |
43 | Keith K Johnson | Center City, MN 55012 | $12,039 |
44 | Steven Houle | Forest Lake, MN 55025 | $11,968 |
45 | Eric Eklund | Ham Lake, MN 55304 | $11,625 |
46 | Charles Wilcox | Harris, MN 55032 | $11,160 |
47 | Bradley Gene Hunter | North Branch, MN 55056 | $10,961 |
48 | Donald J Steinke | Forest Lake, MN 55025 | $10,411 |
49 | Waletzko Brothers LLC | North Branch, MN 55056 | $10,304 |
50 | Stacy Burnside | North Branch, MN 55056 | $9,731 |
51 | Lonnie D Eklund | Stanchfield, MN 55080 | $9,632 |
52 | G. Phillip Rambosek | Shafer, MN 55074 | $9,303 |
53 | Irvin Stolp | Taylors Falls, MN 55084 | $9,277 |
54 | Kurt O Nelson | Shafer, MN 55074 | $9,050 |
55 | Spring Creek Farm LLC | North Branch, MN 55056 | $7,926 |
56 | Dale Thiry | Stanchfield, MN 55080 | $7,715 |
57 | Glenn A Carlson | Lindstrom, MN 55045 | $7,615 |
58 | Womens Environmental Institute | North Branch, MN 55056 | $7,383 |
59 | John Lichtscheidl Jr | Shafer, MN 55074 | $7,337 |
60 | Max A Gustafson | Center City, MN 55012 | $7,285 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”