Farm Subsidy information
Chisago County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Chisago County, Minnesota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 101
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Chisago County, Minnesota totaled $3,683,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Dennis Alan Lemon | Rush City, MN 55069 | $110,802 |
2 | , | $87,650 | |
3 | Kevin Mann | North Branch, MN 55056 | $68,045 |
4 | Barrett K Weness | Saint Croix Falls, WI 54024 | $67,941 |
5 | , | $60,365 | |
6 | Marvin Schroeder | Stillwater, MN 55082 | $58,856 |
7 | Steven Houle | Forest Lake, MN 55025 | $53,994 |
8 | Swenson Farms LLC | North Branch, MN 55056 | $52,076 |
9 | Bruce M Peterson | Chisago City, MN 55013 | $42,525 |
10 | Diane J Peterson | Chisago City, MN 55013 | $42,525 |
11 | East Central Hay LLC | Taylors Falls, MN 55084 | $36,773 |
12 | Chris J Taylor | Forest Lake, MN 55025 | $32,905 |
13 | Keith K Johnson | Center City, MN 55012 | $31,606 |
14 | Lonnie D Eklund | Stanchfield, MN 55080 | $29,334 |
15 | John P Peterson Jr | North Branch, MN 55056 | $27,057 |
16 | Charles Wilcox | Harris, MN 55032 | $25,405 |
17 | Kgl Farms | North Branch, MN 55056 | $24,797 |
18 | Michael C Peterson | Stacy, MN 55079 | $23,619 |
19 | Irvin Stolp | Taylors Falls, MN 55084 | $21,422 |
20 | Martin W Johnson | Taylors Falls, MN 55084 | $19,677 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>