Dairy Programs in Dakota County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 124
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in Dakota County, Minnesota totaled $6,435,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $116,617 |
22 | William Loren Sorg | Hastings, MN 55033 | $106,351 |
23 | Randy Carl Sorg | Hastings, MN 55033 | $106,350 |
24 | David Donnelly | Farmington, MN 55024 | $103,393 |
25 | Wayne M Kieffer | Hastings, MN 55033 | $94,077 |
26 | Century Hills Inc - C/o Kevin Chamberlain | Hastings, MN 55033 | $87,831 |
27 | John C. Bremer- Bremer Revocable Living Trust | Hastings, MN 55033 | $67,869 |
28 | Elmegca Farms | Cannon Falls, MN 55009 | $64,959 |
29 | John E Sauber | Lakeville, MN 55044 | $58,777 |
30 | Jack Lorentz | Cannon Falls, MN 55009 | $55,966 |
31 | Schonning Farm Inc | Farmington, MN 55024 | $53,837 |
32 | Melvin Brochman | Hampton, MN 55031 | $50,173 |
33 | Bremer Farms | Hastings, MN 55033 | $49,971 |
34 | Michael John Leifeld | Cannon Falls, MN 55009 | $43,128 |
35 | Ronald J Weber | Hastings, MN 55033 | $36,956 |
36 | Alan R Bester | Hampton, MN 55031 | $35,848 |
37 | Christopher M Peine | Cannon Falls, MN 55009 | $34,769 |
38 | Elayne B Donnelly | Farmington, MN 55024 | $32,770 |
39 | Richard Conrad Mies | Hampton, MN 55031 | $30,916 |
40 | Marlin Petersen | Northfield, MN 55057 | $25,684 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”