Counter Cyclical Program in Dodge County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 611
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Dodge County, Minnesota totaled $8,682,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Molitor Bros Farm | Cannon Falls, MN 55009 | $254,350 |
2 | Hader Farms Partnership | Zumbrota, MN 55992 | $169,448 |
3 | Rohwer Farms | Dodge Center, MN 55927 | $144,720 |
4 | Kramer Farms Llp | Hayfield, MN 55940 | $133,692 |
5 | Marquette Farms | West Concord, MN 55985 | $126,428 |
6 | Durst Bros C/o Rolland | Mantorville, MN 55955 | $111,891 |
7 | Daniel Welsh | Dodge Center, MN 55927 | $106,827 |
8 | Staub Family Farms | West Concord, MN 55985 | $101,285 |
9 | Arleen Van Zuilen | Claremont, MN 55924 | $86,834 |
10 | Douglas Van Zuilen | Claremont, MN 55924 | $86,834 |
11 | Richard Petefish | Claremont, MN 55924 | $86,550 |
12 | Double B Farms | Mantorville, MN 55955 | $85,659 |
13 | Roger Wrase | Rochester, MN 55902 | $73,744 |
14 | Randal W Reese | Hayfield, MN 55940 | $73,068 |
15 | Franke Brothers | Hayfield, MN 55940 | $72,450 |
16 | Klocke Bros Farms Inc | Hayfield, MN 55940 | $71,982 |
17 | Grant D Erler | West Concord, MN 55985 | $69,975 |
18 | Sterling A Ness | Kasson, MN 55944 | $69,680 |
19 | Thomas R Ness | Kasson, MN 55944 | $69,680 |
20 | Moenning Farms | Dodge Center, MN 55927 | $66,460 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>