Counter Cyclical Program in Dodge County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 611
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Dodge County, Minnesota totaled $8,682,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Roger Toquam | Blooming Prairie, MN 55917 | $40,941 |
62 | Anthony Delain Leth | Mantorville, MN 55955 | $40,120 |
63 | Rador Farms Inc | Dodge Center, MN 55927 | $38,903 |
64 | Jeffrey Gray | Claremont, MN 55924 | $38,737 |
65 | River Oak Farm Inc | Blooming Prairie, MN 55917 | $38,544 |
66 | Richard Louis Van Zuilen | West Concord, MN 55985 | $38,445 |
67 | Martha M Buckwalter | Pine Island, MN 55963 | $38,065 |
68 | Richard K Buckwalter | Kasson, MN 55944 | $38,065 |
69 | Rodney Marquardt | Mantorville, MN 55955 | $37,954 |
70 | Cms Farms Inc | West Concord, MN 55985 | $37,910 |
71 | Roger Kruger | Hayfield, MN 55940 | $37,357 |
72 | Ahrens Farms | Owatonna, MN 55060 | $36,802 |
73 | Lowell Berge | Dodge Center, MN 55927 | $36,402 |
74 | Duane A Masching | Blooming Prairie, MN 55917 | $34,998 |
75 | Scott J Masching | Hayfield, MN 55940 | $34,998 |
76 | Rlg Acres Inc | Dodge Center, MN 55927 | $34,790 |
77 | Larry Scherger | Dodge Center, MN 55927 | $33,794 |
78 | Roger E Sowieja | Dodge Center, MN 55927 | $33,649 |
79 | Darrel Trom | Blooming Prairie, MN 55917 | $32,828 |
80 | John D Kruger | Hayfield, MN 55940 | $32,754 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”