Farm Subsidy information
Freeborn County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Freeborn County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 3,637
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Freeborn County, Minnesota totaled $582,647,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Mhf Of Freeborn County, Inc. | Austin, MN 55912 | $1,443,474 |
22 | Ronald P Thompson | Emmons, MN 56029 | $1,424,593 |
23 | Scott Thompson | Austin, MN 55912 | $1,394,941 |
24 | Mark A Johnson | Ellendale, MN 56026 | $1,394,170 |
25 | Gary Peterson | Hayward, MN 56043 | $1,394,026 |
26 | Dann Phillips | Hartland, MN 56042 | $1,387,719 |
27 | Ricky D Krueger | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $1,386,527 |
28 | David Greibrok | Lyle, MN 55953 | $1,386,408 |
29 | Andersland Inc | Emmons, MN 56029 | $1,374,463 |
30 | Epland Brothers Partnership | Twin Lakes, MN 56089 | $1,319,862 |
31 | David G Petersen | Alden, MN 56009 | $1,318,466 |
32 | John Patrick Attig | Glenville, MN 56036 | $1,312,535 |
33 | Jeffrey Wayne | Geneva, MN 56035 | $1,298,456 |
34 | Michael Ellingson | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $1,297,004 |
35 | Albert Schuster | Hartland, MN 56042 | $1,296,248 |
36 | David Cech | Glenville, MN 56036 | $1,290,043 |
37 | Robert A Nelson | Alden, MN 56009 | $1,289,091 |
38 | Dale Phillips | Hartland, MN 56042 | $1,275,908 |
39 | Michael Brekke | Hartland, MN 56042 | $1,253,924 |
40 | Marlowe Wangen | Hayward, MN 56043 | $1,247,368 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”