Farm Subsidy information
Freeborn County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Freeborn County, Minnesota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 3,531
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Freeborn County, Minnesota totaled $551,049,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Randy Heideman | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $1,214,084 |
42 | Roger Peterson | Clarks Grove, MN 56016 | $1,183,728 |
43 | Yost Bros Farms | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $1,165,217 |
44 | Allen Mc Gill | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $1,146,196 |
45 | Virgil Thofson | Hartland, MN 56042 | $1,146,104 |
46 | Dennis Magnuson | Austin, MN 55912 | $1,128,075 |
47 | Alexander Z Pirkl | Ellendale, MN 56026 | $1,115,673 |
48 | Brian Demmer | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $1,114,899 |
49 | John Korman | Alden, MN 56009 | $1,110,989 |
50 | Allan Ravenhorst | Hollandale, MN 56045 | $1,107,585 |
51 | Allan Greibrok | Austin, MN 55912 | $1,104,921 |
52 | Diana Magnuson | Austin, MN 55912 | $1,098,312 |
53 | David Ausen | Alden, MN 56009 | $1,093,169 |
54 | Jerry Demmer | Clarks Grove, MN 56016 | $1,093,073 |
55 | Ronald Neubauer | Wells, MN 56097 | $1,092,113 |
56 | Thomas Fredrick Lorenzen | Glenville, MN 56036 | $1,081,843 |
57 | Steven Thrond | Walters, MN 56097 | $1,080,297 |
58 | Franklin Gjersvik | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $1,073,965 |
59 | Donald Arthur Yost | Albert Lea, MN 56007 | $1,066,099 |
60 | Steven R Peterson | Alden, MN 56009 | $1,062,793 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”