Farm Subsidy information
Itasca County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Itasca County, Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 67
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Itasca County, Minnesota totaled $735,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | J & A Logging Inc | Effie, MN 56639 | $52,875 |
| 2 | Hill Logging LLC | Bovey, MN 55709 | $52,875 |
| 3 | Nelson Wood Products Of Togo Inc | Togo, MN 55723 | $52,875 |
| 4 | Donald W Nelson Logging Inc | Cook, MN 55723 | $42,653 |
| 5 | Ted W Kromy | Grand Rapids, MN 55744 | $38,083 |
| 6 | Duane Allan Ferdig | Northome, MN 56661 | $37,789 |
| 7 | Beier's Greenhouse, Inc. | Grand Rapids, MN 55744 | $34,291 |
| 8 | Richard Brink | Deer River, MN 56636 | $33,398 |
| 9 | Hafeman Trucking | Bigfork, MN 56628 | $24,360 |
| 10 | Andy Jobe Trucking LLC | Grand Rapids, MN 55744 | $23,650 |
| 11 | Vezina Trucking | Max, MN 56659 | $18,152 |
| 12 | Teamwork Trucking LLC | Nashwauk, MN 55769 | $18,137 |
| 13 | Jackson Farms Of Blackberry LLC | Grand Rapids, MN 55744 | $17,989 |
| 14 | Blake E Stotts | Grand Rapids, MN 55744 | $17,853 |
| 15 | Gordy Klegstad Trucking | Wirt, MN 56688 | $12,278 |
| 16 | Michael Funnell | Grand Rapids, MN 55744 | $11,041 |
| 17 | David P Radaich | Goodland, MN 55742 | $10,187 |
| 18 | Douglas D Peterson | Bovey, MN 55709 | $9,591 |
| 19 | Daryl Joseph Jobe | Grand Rapids, MN 55744 | $6,654 |
| 20 | Dns Transport LLC | Deer River, MN 56636 | $6,460 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf