Water Bank Program in Kandiyohi County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 108
Recipients of Water Bank Program from farms in Kandiyohi County, Minnesota totaled $115,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Water Bank Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Wm Latham | Spicer, MN 56288 | $1,776 |
22 | Rose Berg | Sunburg, MN 56289 | $1,670 |
23 | Schueler Farms Inc | Willmar, MN 56201 | $1,610 |
24 | C D E Management Company | Paynesville, MN 56362 | $1,607 |
25 | James Wick | Sunburg, MN 56289 | $1,525 |
26 | Dean A Nelson | Atwater, MN 56209 | $1,522 |
27 | Roger W Strand | New London, MN 56273 | $1,505 |
28 | Audrey Sondrol | Sunburg, MN 56289 | $1,505 |
29 | Arthur P Norris | Hawick, MN 56273 | $1,480 |
30 | Leuverne W Danielson | Pennock, MN 56279 | $1,454 |
31 | L Wayne Larson | Willmar, MN 56201 | $1,410 |
32 | Max Malkuch | Pennock, MN 56279 | $1,351 |
33 | Ruth Field | White Bear Lake, MN 55110 | $1,329 |
34 | Elroy E Jones | New London, MN 56273 | $1,317 |
35 | Dennis G Lindquist | New London, MN 56273 | $1,289 |
36 | Donald L Peterson | Atwater, MN 56209 | $1,258 |
37 | Daniel Binsfeld | Paynesville, MN 56362 | $1,242 |
38 | Priscilla A Johnson | Waite Park, MN 56387 | $1,228 |
39 | Tom Wendlandt | Paynesville, MN 56362 | $1,197 |
40 | Gary V Noehl | New London, MN 56273 | $1,180 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”