Total Conservation Programs in Kandiyohi County, Minnesota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 945
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Kandiyohi County, Minnesota totaled $4,804,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hatlestad Bros | New London, MN 56273 | $50,000 |
2 | Dallas A Fenske | Paynesville, MN 56362 | $50,000 |
3 | Paul D Hentges | Great Bend, ND 58075 | $50,000 |
4 | , | $49,167 | |
5 | Dean A Nelson | Atwater, MN 56209 | $46,481 |
6 | Rahn T Annis | Spicer, MN 56288 | $42,538 |
7 | Helen A Anderson | Willmar, MN 56201 | $41,638 |
8 | Robert H Brauchler | Belgrade, MN 56312 | $38,422 |
9 | Chris Willard Hofstad | New London, MN 56273 | $38,373 |
10 | Eldon J Hanson | New London, MN 56273 | $38,101 |
11 | Compeer Financial ** | Fulda, MN 56131 | $36,311 |
12 | Carl Holstad | New London, MN 56273 | $36,241 |
13 | Catherine Wersal | Ocklawaha, FL 32179 | $35,268 |
14 | Barry Dunning | Oak Park, MN 56357 | $35,053 |
15 | Caroline Kreps | Willmar, MN 56201 | $34,188 |
16 | Lora Larson | Belgrade, MN 56312 | $33,949 |
17 | Rohne Properties | Willmar, MN 56201 | $33,586 |
18 | Alan D Carlson | Willmar, MN 56201 | $32,554 |
19 | Scott A Johnson | Kandiyohi, MN 56251 | $32,246 |
20 | Lorraine Danielson | New London, MN 56273 | $31,735 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>