Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Lincoln County, Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 472
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Lincoln County, Minnesota totaled $4,510,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Tim Neyens | Minneota, MN 56264 | $34,143 |
22 | L & B Olsen Farms Inc | Lake Benton, MN 56149 | $33,290 |
23 | Theodore L Nelson | Hendricks, MN 56136 | $32,804 |
24 | Christopher A Nelson | Hendricks, MN 56136 | $30,956 |
25 | Lowell Thooft | Tyler, MN 56178 | $30,742 |
26 | Timothy Thooft | Tyler, MN 56178 | $30,742 |
27 | Edward J Nissen | Lake Benton, MN 56149 | $29,888 |
28 | Rost Farms | Ivanhoe, MN 56142 | $29,071 |
29 | Travis D Olsen | Hendricks, MN 56136 | $28,484 |
30 | Cristy Olsen | Hendricks, MN 56136 | $28,484 |
31 | Jakland Farms Inc | Lake Benton, MN 56149 | $28,235 |
32 | Nathan M Hesse | Mountain Lake, MN 56159 | $27,710 |
33 | Kelly Sik | Lake Benton, MN 56149 | $27,577 |
34 | Anna Marie Hesse | Tyler, MN 56178 | $26,954 |
35 | Paul Fehrman | Lake Benton, MN 56149 | $26,933 |
36 | Andrew P Jensen | Tyler, MN 56178 | $26,651 |
37 | Weber Land & Cattle Inc | Lake Benton, MN 56149 | $26,375 |
38 | Steven Mark Hesse | Tyler, MN 56178 | $25,652 |
39 | Timothy P Jerzak | Ivanhoe, MN 56142 | $25,588 |
40 | Ronald Nuese | Hendricks, MN 56136 | $24,526 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”