Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Lincoln County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 772
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Lincoln County, Minnesota totaled $17,765,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Weber Farms Inc | Lake Benton, MN 56149 | $116,382 |
22 | Rost Farms | Ivanhoe, MN 56142 | $114,702 |
23 | Randy Janiszeski | Porter, MN 56280 | $113,474 |
24 | Dan D Deutz | Lake Benton, MN 56149 | $109,981 |
25 | Lund And Lund Of Tyler Inc | Tyler, MN 56178 | $109,010 |
26 | Timothy P Jerzak | Ivanhoe, MN 56142 | $108,246 |
27 | Kelly Krog | Arco, MN 56113 | $105,860 |
28 | Randall R Bushman | Lake Benton, MN 56149 | $103,185 |
29 | Darrell Oerter | Tyler, MN 56178 | $99,753 |
30 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $97,794 |
31 | Robert W Worth | Lake Benton, MN 56149 | $97,582 |
32 | Kenneth Krog | Lake Benton, MN 56149 | $96,476 |
33 | Wayne Bednarek | Ivanhoe, MN 56142 | $94,012 |
34 | Sixta Farms LLC | Lake Benton, MN 56149 | $93,555 |
35 | Jakland Farms Inc | Lake Benton, MN 56149 | $91,929 |
36 | Timothy Thooft | Tyler, MN 56178 | $89,415 |
37 | Jon Miles Johnson | Tyler, MN 56178 | $89,258 |
38 | Paul Fehrman | Lake Benton, MN 56149 | $88,839 |
39 | Lowell Thooft | Tyler, MN 56178 | $87,274 |
40 | Lance A Weber | Elkton, SD 57026 | $86,993 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”