Production Flexibility Program in Martin County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,431
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Martin County, Minnesota totaled $53,024,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Roger Moore | Blue Earth, MN 56013 | $188,800 |
22 | Steven D Hendricks | Welcome, MN 56181 | $188,644 |
23 | Sandra Larson | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $184,064 |
24 | Quiet Acres Inc | Elmore, MN 56027 | $182,145 |
25 | Gary E Hanson | Granada, MN 56039 | $181,987 |
26 | Tumbleson Farms Inc | Sherburn, MN 56171 | $181,695 |
27 | Robert J Leet | Granada, MN 56039 | $180,197 |
28 | Rolling Green Farms Inc | Welcome, MN 56181 | $176,517 |
29 | Airborne Farms Inc | Sherburn, MN 56171 | $176,243 |
30 | Calvin Saxton | Granada, MN 56039 | $172,159 |
31 | William Thiede | North Mankato, MN 56003 | $171,559 |
32 | Farm Air Inc | Dunnell, MN 56127 | $169,324 |
33 | Donald R Snyder Jr | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $168,670 |
34 | Lunz Farms Inc | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $166,842 |
35 | Jay Oltmans | Sherburn, MN 56171 | $164,911 |
36 | Roger C Nelson | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $164,352 |
37 | Redenius Farms Inc | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $162,687 |
38 | David Lenort | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $161,670 |
39 | Mark C Ufer | Sherburn, MN 56171 | $161,037 |
40 | Frank Milow | Fairmont, MN 56031 | $160,859 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”