Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Mower County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 570
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Mower County, Minnesota totaled $12,326,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Oudekirk Bros Partnership | Elkton, MN 55933 | $112,981 |
22 | Meadow View Farms | Dexter, MN 55926 | $108,875 |
23 | Four Way Farm Inc | Adams, MN 55909 | $105,960 |
24 | Derek Joseph Clement | Spring Valley, MN 55975 | $95,047 |
25 | Lena Mehmen Family Farms Gp | Plainfield, IA 50666 | $90,775 |
26 | Sayles Family Farms LLC | Austin, MN 55912 | $89,086 |
27 | Clinton Ward Bergene | Rose Creek, MN 55970 | $78,702 |
28 | Mark A Schaefer | Taopi, MN 55977 | $76,960 |
29 | Kenyon Farms LLC | Austin, MN 55912 | $75,630 |
30 | Grass & Sons Farms | Le Roy, MN 55951 | $74,493 |
31 | Gehling Legacy Farms | Grand Meadow, MN 55936 | $73,022 |
32 | Peter Marx | Le Roy, MN 55951 | $71,034 |
33 | Brian W Bergene | Rose Creek, MN 55970 | $66,253 |
34 | William Blanchard | Waltham, MN 55982 | $65,491 |
35 | Douglas Sheely | Brownsdale, MN 55918 | $65,084 |
36 | Matthew Douglas Carpenter | Grand Meadow, MN 55936 | $64,070 |
37 | Bissen Farms Inc | Adams, MN 55909 | $60,028 |
38 | Mj Merten Ptr | Austin, MN 55912 | $56,023 |
39 | Michael Main | Le Roy, MN 55951 | $51,790 |
40 | Hanson Farms | Grand Meadow, MN 55936 | $51,061 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”