Total Conservation Programs in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 463
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Olmsted County, Minnesota totaled $2,665,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Gail Rosalyn Klassen | Saint Charles, MN 55972 | $23,934 |
22 | David L Strain | Byron, MN 55920 | $22,544 |
23 | Michelle L Redmond | Rochester, MN 55906 | $21,574 |
24 | John F Keefe | Dover, MN 55929 | $21,239 |
25 | Michael L Clark | Byron, MN 55920 | $20,506 |
26 | Marvin Viker | Byron, MN 55920 | $20,301 |
27 | Elmer Rubow | Rochester, MN 55904 | $19,377 |
28 | Liberty Farms LLC | Chatfield, MN 55923 | $18,469 |
29 | Dick J Degeus Jr | Racine, MN 55967 | $17,999 |
30 | Mandell Coulson | Dover, MN 55929 | $17,485 |
31 | Charles William Bigelow | Elgin, MN 55932 | $16,981 |
32 | Petersen South Inc | Ramsey, MN 55303 | $16,803 |
33 | Dale Cushman | Eyota, MN 55934 | $16,551 |
34 | Nancy P Cole Revocable Trust Agreement Dated June | Rochester, MN 55906 | $16,547 |
35 | Richard A Pressnall | Pine Island, MN 55963 | $16,419 |
36 | Bryan John Decook | Stewartville, MN 55976 | $15,987 |
37 | Hanna Elshoff | Chatfield, MN 55923 | $15,202 |
38 | Robert Alan Tiedemann | Zumbro Falls, MN 55991 | $15,153 |
39 | Brenda L Reichel | Chatfield, MN 55923 | $14,988 |
40 | Randall Robinson | Stewartville, MN 55976 | $14,832 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”