Farm Subsidy information
Olmsted County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,004
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Olmsted County, Minnesota totaled $18,289,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Thomas A Berg | Pine Island, MN 55963 | $63,028 |
42 | Joseph Arthur Bianchi | Elgin, MN 55932 | $62,575 |
43 | Penny Lou Bianchi | Elgin, MN 55932 | $62,575 |
44 | Warren Richard Remold | Byron, MN 55920 | $62,387 |
45 | Tanner Ernst Ferrier | Chatfield, MN 55923 | $62,100 |
46 | Paul Novotny | Chatfield, MN 55923 | $61,794 |
47 | Lee Jay Small | Saint Charles, MN 55972 | $61,686 |
48 | Tina Christine Small | Saint Charles, MN 55972 | $61,686 |
49 | Kts Farms LLC | Minnetonka, MN 55345 | $60,245 |
50 | Graham Properties Ltd | Rogers, MN 55374 | $59,283 |
51 | Wendt Farms Of Eyota Inc | Eyota, MN 55934 | $57,878 |
52 | Eric S Walker | Zumbro Falls, MN 55991 | $56,719 |
53 | Gary D Wingert | Dover, MN 55929 | $56,474 |
54 | Michael Richard Bale | Byron, MN 55920 | $55,991 |
55 | Brandon S Ihrke | Eyota, MN 55934 | $54,432 |
56 | Donley Farms Inc | Byron, MN 55920 | $53,558 |
57 | Donald Edwin Bicknese | Chatfield, MN 55923 | $52,333 |
58 | Steven Vermilya | Dover, MN 55929 | $51,400 |
59 | Michel Farming LLC | Zumbro Falls, MN 55991 | $51,284 |
60 | Klassen Farms | St Charles, MN 55972 | $50,861 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”