Total Commodity Programs in Otter Tail County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 2,972
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Otter Tail County, Minnesota totaled $121,792,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Gorentz Dairy LLC | Dent, MN 56528 | $311,373 |
82 | Tony Peeters | Menahga, MN 56464 | $310,647 |
83 | Donald R Honer | Perham, MN 56573 | $305,334 |
84 | Perham Egg LLC | Perham, MN 56573 | $303,115 |
85 | Pine Breeze Farm LLC | Deer Creek, MN 56527 | $300,775 |
86 | Michael Ruther | Perham, MN 56573 | $293,137 |
87 | Rosentreter Brothers | Vergas, MN 56587 | $292,346 |
88 | Tom R Ladwig | Vining, MN 56588 | $291,629 |
89 | Blake Farms Inc | Ottertail, MN 56571 | $287,546 |
90 | Charles Schornack | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $286,116 |
91 | Ehnert Farms Inc | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $285,568 |
92 | Mark Riestenberg | Perham, MN 56573 | $284,624 |
93 | Weller & Huwe Dairy Farm | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $284,526 |
94 | Terry Meyer | Perham, MN 56573 | $282,835 |
95 | Allen Antonsen | Frazee, MN 56544 | $281,986 |
96 | Jon Ewy | Ottertail, MN 56571 | $277,161 |
97 | Robert P Ruther | Perham, MN 56573 | $276,185 |
98 | Dorvin Ruther | Perham, MN 56573 | $275,751 |
99 | J David Bendix | Deer Creek, MN 56527 | $274,708 |
100 | Dale Menze | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $274,426 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”