Farm Subsidy information
Otter Tail County, Minnesota
Total Subsidies in Otter Tail County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 4,633
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Otter Tail County, Minnesota totaled $416,812,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Faith Acres Dairy Inc | Hewitt, MN 56453 | $922,196 |
22 | Sandhill Dairy Inc | Perham, MN 56573 | $853,886 |
23 | Roberts Dairy LLC | Menahga, MN 56464 | $828,341 |
24 | Gary And Harvey Flatau Farms | Frazee, MN 56544 | $809,249 |
25 | Ronald J Tobkin | Perham, MN 56573 | $803,461 |
26 | R D Offutt Company | Fargo, ND 58106 | $746,199 |
27 | Hendrickx Bros Farms | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $730,089 |
28 | Jorgenson Dairy Inc | Perham, MN 56573 | $722,852 |
29 | Bernal R Cichy | Henning, MN 56551 | $719,820 |
30 | Dennis Tigges | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $704,925 |
31 | Gary Greenwood | Henning, MN 56551 | $703,868 |
32 | Kollview Farms LLC | Sebeka, MN 56477 | $698,496 |
33 | Keith Goeller | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $674,687 |
34 | Robb Oyster | Hewitt, MN 56453 | $651,990 |
35 | Ronald Palubicki | Perham, MN 56573 | $647,537 |
36 | Michael C Menze | Ottertail, MN 56571 | $646,391 |
37 | Stanley Eckhoff | Henning, MN 56551 | $645,602 |
38 | Russell Palubicki | New York Mills, MN 56567 | $645,212 |
39 | Terry Hoffman | Vergas, MN 56587 | $627,758 |
40 | Bradley Linder | Henning, MN 56551 | $618,514 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”