Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Pennington County, Minnesota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 74
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Pennington County, Minnesota totaled $240,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Erick Trontvet | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $26,877 |
2 | Tyler J Solberg | East Grand Forks, MN 56721 | $23,353 |
3 | James J Wilson | Goodridge, MN 56725 | $19,833 |
4 | Jerilyn L Wilson | Goodridge, MN 56725 | $9,971 |
5 | Misty Mehrkens | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $9,414 |
6 | Donovan D Dyrdal Estate | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $8,770 |
7 | Joshua James Wilson | Goodridge, MN 56725 | $7,224 |
8 | Brian P Lundeen | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $6,776 |
9 | Arlene Novak | Saint Hilaire, MN 56754 | $6,419 |
10 | Steve Bryl | Goodridge, MN 56725 | $6,070 |
11 | Mathew Russell Barth | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $6,045 |
12 | Daniel Allen Linder | Alvarado, MN 56710 | $5,872 |
13 | Benjamin Hanson | Red Lake Falls, MN 56750 | $5,777 |
14 | Zeb Nelson | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $5,653 |
15 | Alex Carlson | Goodridge, MN 56725 | $5,396 |
16 | , | $5,286 | |
17 | Kiefer A Kainz | Goodridge, MN 56725 | $4,958 |
18 | Lucille Scholin | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $4,839 |
19 | Jana D Bakke | Newfolden, MN 56738 | $4,803 |
20 | Jordan J Rondorf | Thief River Falls, MN 56701 | $4,165 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>