Total Commodity Programs in Pennington County, Minnesota, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,602

Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Pennington County, Minnesota totaled $115,335,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Commodity Programs
1995-2021
1Engelstad Farms Of Rocksbury PartThief River Falls, MN 56701$2,221,596
2Harzke FarmsGoodridge, MN 56725$1,650,475
3Kenton ChristensenThief River Falls, MN 56701$1,380,654
4Thomas A ScholinThief River Falls, MN 56701$1,370,994
5Keith ChristensenThief River Falls, MN 56701$1,356,613
6Curtis ChristensenThief River Falls, MN 56701$1,347,236
7Coan FarmsGoodridge, MN 56725$1,339,257
8Kristen IncThief River Falls, MN 56701$1,334,224
9Wade JoppruThief River Falls, MN 56701$1,325,830
10Gregory HilgemanOklee, MN 56742$1,325,682
11Donovan D DyrdalThief River Falls, MN 56701$1,307,961
12Curtis W Swanson Revocable TrustThief River Falls, MN 56701$1,223,923
13Pribyl Hay And Straw, LlpPlummer, MN 56748$1,185,763
14Scott HuttonThief River Falls, MN 56701$1,141,545
15Pete C Carlson Revocable Trust AgreementThief River Falls, MN 56701$1,094,391
16Kenneth J AspThief River Falls, MN 56701$1,054,157
17Kotrba FarmsGoodridge, MN 56725$1,036,202
18Earl HoeferThief River Falls, MN 56701$1,016,956
19Dale M NelsonThief River Falls, MN 56701$1,008,881
20Arlene M PetersonPlummer, MN 56748$981,945

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag