Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Pipestone County, Minnesota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 226
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Pipestone County, Minnesota totaled $1,445,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Herlan Schut | Sioux Center, IA 51250 | $13,734 |
22 | Alan Vander Lugt | Edgerton, MN 56128 | $13,054 |
23 | Bradley Tuinstra | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $12,872 |
24 | Eugene Halbur | Jasper, MN 56144 | $12,844 |
25 | Jason Lee Galvin | Edgerton, MN 56128 | $12,238 |
26 | David L Veldhuizen | Edgerton, MN 56128 | $12,112 |
27 | Brian Kas | Woodstock, MN 56186 | $12,104 |
28 | Nokomis Farms Llp | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $11,577 |
29 | Jeremy S Van Essen | Edgerton, MN 56128 | $11,293 |
30 | Wesley Dekam | Edgerton, MN 56128 | $11,231 |
31 | Glenn Harold Johnson | Verdi, MN 56164 | $11,103 |
32 | Darrell Fikse | Woodstock, MN 56186 | $10,465 |
33 | Dennis R Reese | Jasper, MN 56144 | $9,108 |
34 | Uilk Farms Inc | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $8,596 |
35 | Kracht Family Farms LLC | Edgerton, MN 56128 | $8,405 |
36 | Michael John Fruechte | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $8,381 |
37 | Hubbling Farms LLC | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $8,196 |
38 | Dean Jaycox | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $8,190 |
39 | Douglas Jaycox | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $8,190 |
40 | Cary R Alderson | Ruthton, MN 56170 | $7,960 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”