Total Conservation Programs in Pipestone County, Minnesota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 893
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Pipestone County, Minnesota totaled $24,092,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Glenn Krog | Lake Benton, MN 56149 | $623,827 |
2 | Cottonwood Angus Farms | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $472,951 |
3 | Marty Wallin | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $462,676 |
4 | Joseph Stepanek Irrevocable Trust | Lincoln, NE 68521 | $366,048 |
5 | Edward Brockhouse | Lake Benton, MN 56149 | $321,728 |
6 | Donald Evers | Lake Benton, MN 56149 | $279,471 |
7 | Betty Huebner Trust | Sioux Falls, SD 57106 | $273,077 |
8 | Gary Tholen | Pensacola, FL 32513 | $264,882 |
9 | David Flatebo | Lake Benton, MN 56149 | $264,019 |
10 | Alvina Vander Sluis Revocable Tru | Mankato, MN 56001 | $256,066 |
11 | Wilton Dickerson | Fairfax, VA 22032 | $235,508 |
12 | Jerry Minett | Ruthton, MN 56170 | $230,956 |
13 | Wayne Williamson | Yankton, SD 57078 | $227,000 |
14 | Willow Creek Land Co | Wentworth, SD 57075 | $225,841 |
15 | Rollin Reber | Dennison, MN 55018 | $208,587 |
16 | Dale Wussow | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $204,258 |
17 | Jon Kozlowski | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $199,532 |
18 | Steve Lange | Pipestone, MN 56164 | $196,867 |
19 | Schulze Family Irrevocable Trust | Holland, MN 56139 | $194,350 |
20 | Stuart Sybesma | Lindstrom, MN 55045 | $185,640 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>